Obasanjo, an army engineer, was a Lieutenant Colonel at the 3rd Division in Jos, Plateau State.
Boko Haram militants
attacked a platoon led by the son of former Nigerian president
Obansanjo, shooting him today. He sustained serious injuries to his
legs, and
has been transported to the hospitalHe and his platoon were engaged with Boko Haram militants at Baza, which is the village of the General Officer Commanding (GOC) of the division when the incident took place.
24 soldiers in the platoon were killed.
DIVORCE SAGA: Court
papers show Anita Oyakhilome did not accuse husband of adultery
By Ezekiel Attah on September 7, 2014
Pin It
IMG_3869.JPG
Court papers filed by Pastor Anita Oyakhilome seeking to divorce her
husband, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, the President of Believers’ Love World
Inc., popularly known as Christ Embassy, has shown that adultery was
not part of her reasons.
The papers showed that she is seeks divorce on behaviours that suggest
that she cannot ‘reasonably be expected’ to live with him contrary
media report that Anita decided to divorce Pastor Chris based on
allegations of ‘adultery’ and ‘unreasonable behaviours’
According to report from ThisDay, the court papers for the divorce
process filed at the Principal Registry of the Family Division (PRFD)
of the High Court of Justice revealed that she applied for “divorce on
the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.”
In her statement of case in support of petition at PRFD with number
FD14001650, Pastor Anita however, accused her husband of having
inappropriate relationship with some of his female staff members.
According to the statement, “the wife has discussed with the husband his
appropriate relationship with some of his female staff members. She has
explained that this has given her cause for concern. The husband has
minimised her worries and taken no step to alleviate her grievances.”
In fact, the statement indicated no allegation of adultery as there was
no co-respondent to the petition and no names were mentioned.
Dictionary.com defines adultery as “voluntary sexual intercourse between
a married person and a person who is not their spouse.”
The statement reads in part: “The wife submits that her marriage to the
husband has irretrievably broken down and there is no hope of
reconciliation.
“The wife will submit that it is the husband’s unreasonable behaviours
which have led to this.
“The husband and the wife are both Pastors. The husband undertakes his
work, in the main, in South Africa and Nigeria. The wife lives in the
United Kingdom.
“The wife will say that they have lived separately for 16 years and over
this time have drifted apart.
“The wife has come to realise that the husband will only visit the UK
for annual church programmes that he holds rather than to be with this
wife.
“The wife feels that he has been unavailable as a father to their
children during their developing years.
“The wife feels that their marriage suffered under the pressure of their
work.
“They would rarely spend time together due to the husband
unavailability.
“Special occasions such as Christmas, Birthdays and family occasions and
anniversaries past them by and their rarely spent any time together as a
family as the husband was more devoted to his work than he was to them.
“The wife feels that she has been used to portray and enhance the
husband’s image as a family man when the reality is that there is no
existing relationship between them.
“She feels that she has been present for official functions simply for
his convenience. On occasions she has been copied into his travel
itinerary which has been given to him by his staff on a need to know
basis.
“The wife has tried to discuss her concerns with the husband. He claims
that she is carnal and he is insensitive to her feelings and her needs.”
“As a result of the husband’s attitude to their marriage, the wife will
say that he is virtually not recognised as a married man in the
ministry. His teachings and beliefs on marriage is that the husband is a
master and a controller and the wife will say that his concept of
biblical; submission is so extreme that it is impossible for her to meet
his expectations. She feels humiliated by the way he treats her in the
presence of his close female staff members and she feels that she has
been taken for granted which has become unbearably stressful for her.
“The wife will say that the relationship with the husband is
non-existent to the point that his itinerary which was announced
publicly at the beginning of the year had no provision for time with his
family.
“His staff members who travel with him organise both his personal and
professional life without any input from her. The wife will say that she
is treated with disregard almost like akin to an intruder.
“The wife feels that she has been mentally, physically and emotionally
deprived of the experience of a marital relationship. She feels that the
husband has persistently judged her and his communication with her has
been unduly harsh. The wife knows that he was hard to please and has
been extremely critical. The wife reserves the right to expand on all of
these particulars if the divorce petition is defended.”
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
DIVORCE SAGA: Court
papers show Anita Oyakhilome did not accuse husband of adultery
By Ezekiel Attah on September 7, 2014
Pin It
IMG_3869.JPG
Court papers filed by Pastor Anita Oyakhilome seeking to divorce her
husband, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, the President of Believers’ Love World
Inc., popularly known as Christ Embassy, has shown that adultery was
not part of her reasons.
The papers showed that she is seeks divorce on behaviours that suggest
that she cannot ‘reasonably be expected’ to live with him contrary
media report that Anita decided to divorce Pastor Chris based on
allegations of ‘adultery’ and ‘unreasonable behaviours’
According to report from ThisDay, the court papers for the divorce
process filed at the Principal Registry of the Family Division (PRFD)
of the High Court of Justice revealed that she applied for “divorce on
the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.”
In her statement of case in support of petition at PRFD with number
FD14001650, Pastor Anita however, accused her husband of having
inappropriate relationship with some of his female staff members.
According to the statement, “the wife has discussed with the husband his
appropriate relationship with some of his female staff members. She has
explained that this has given her cause for concern. The husband has
minimised her worries and taken no step to alleviate her grievances.”
In fact, the statement indicated no allegation of adultery as there was
no co-respondent to the petition and no names were mentioned.
Dictionary.com defines adultery as “voluntary sexual intercourse between
a married person and a person who is not their spouse.”
The statement reads in part: “The wife submits that her marriage to the
husband has irretrievably broken down and there is no hope of
reconciliation.
“The wife will submit that it is the husband’s unreasonable behaviours
which have led to this.
“The husband and the wife are both Pastors. The husband undertakes his
work, in the main, in South Africa and Nigeria. The wife lives in the
United Kingdom.
“The wife will say that they have lived separately for 16 years and over
this time have drifted apart.
“The wife has come to realise that the husband will only visit the UK
for annual church programmes that he holds rather than to be with this
wife.
“The wife feels that he has been unavailable as a father to their
children during their developing years.
“The wife feels that their marriage suffered under the pressure of their
work.
“They would rarely spend time together due to the husband
unavailability.
“Special occasions such as Christmas, Birthdays and family occasions and
anniversaries past them by and their rarely spent any time together as a
family as the husband was more devoted to his work than he was to them.
“The wife feels that she has been used to portray and enhance the
husband’s image as a family man when the reality is that there is no
existing relationship between them.
“She feels that she has been present for official functions simply for
his convenience. On occasions she has been copied into his travel
itinerary which has been given to him by his staff on a need to know
basis.
“The wife has tried to discuss her concerns with the husband. He claims
that she is carnal and he is insensitive to her feelings and her needs.”
“As a result of the husband’s attitude to their marriage, the wife will
say that he is virtually not recognised as a married man in the
ministry. His teachings and beliefs on marriage is that the husband is a
master and a controller and the wife will say that his concept of
biblical; submission is so extreme that it is impossible for her to meet
his expectations. She feels humiliated by the way he treats her in the
presence of his close female staff members and she feels that she has
been taken for granted which has become unbearably stressful for her.
“The wife will say that the relationship with the husband is
non-existent to the point that his itinerary which was announced
publicly at the beginning of the year had no provision for time with his
family.
“His staff members who travel with him organise both his personal and
professional life without any input from her. The wife will say that she
is treated with disregard almost like akin to an intruder.
“The wife feels that she has been mentally, physically and emotionally
deprived of the experience of a marital relationship. She feels that the
husband has persistently judged her and his communication with her has
been unduly harsh. The wife knows that he was hard to please and has
been extremely critical. The wife reserves the right to expand on all of
these particulars if the divorce petition is defended.”
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
No fight between police and civil defence – Police PRO 
Published on September 7, 2014 by pmnews · No Comments
A police officer threatens to shoot Abolurin and other NSCDC officials
The Force Public Relations Officer (FPRO), Emmanuel Ojukwu, on Sunday said there was no rift between the Police and the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC).
Ojukwu, the acting Commissioner of Police, told NAN in Lagos on phone that the police and the NSCDC were members of the same family, working for one purpose.
He dismissed reports that some policemen attacked NSCDC operatives by their headquarters in Abuja as untrue.
“The Police and the Civil Defence are one family. Our relationship is that of a brother and sister of the same family. We don’t have any problem with them.
Abolurin gestures at his men to stand down
According to him, the police is still investigating the alleged attempt by a police inspector to fire at the Commandant General of the NSCDC, Dr Ade Abolurin in Lagos.
On 22 August, NSCDC alleged that a police inspector attempted to fire at Abolurin in Ikorodu, Lagos.
The Corps, on Friday, also alleged that about 10 policemen launched an attack on its men in front of the NSCDC headquarters in Abuja.
DIVORCE SAGA: Court papers show Anita Oyakhilome did not accuse husband of adultery By Ezekiel Attah on September 7, 2014 Pin It IMG_3869.JPG Court papers filed by Pastor Anita Oyakhilome seeking to divorce her husband, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, the President of Believers’ Love World Inc., popularly known as Christ Embassy, has shown that adultery was not part of her reasons. The papers showed that she is seeks divorce on behaviours that suggest that she cannot ‘reasonably be expected’ to live with him contrary media report that Anita decided to divorce Pastor Chris based on allegations of ‘adultery’ and ‘unreasonable behaviours’ According to report from ThisDay, the court papers for the divorce process filed at the Principal Registry of the Family Division (PRFD) of the High Court of Justice revealed that she applied for “divorce on the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.” In her statement of case in support of petition at PRFD with number FD14001650, Pastor Anita however, accused her husband of having inappropriate relationship with some of his female staff members. According to the statement, “the wife has discussed with the husband his appropriate relationship with some of his female staff members. She has explained that this has given her cause for concern. The husband has minimised her worries and taken no step to alleviate her grievances.” In fact, the statement indicated no allegation of adultery as there was no co-respondent to the petition and no names were mentioned. Dictionary.com defines adultery as “voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not their spouse.” The statement reads in part: “The wife submits that her marriage to the husband has irretrievably broken down and there is no hope of reconciliation. “The wife will submit that it is the husband’s unreasonable behaviours which have led to this. “The husband and the wife are both Pastors. The husband undertakes his work, in the main, in South Africa and Nigeria. The wife lives in the United Kingdom. “The wife will say that they have lived separately for 16 years and over this time have drifted apart. “The wife has come to realise that the husband will only visit the UK for annual church programmes that he holds rather than to be with this wife. “The wife feels that he has been unavailable as a father to their children during their developing years. “The wife feels that their marriage suffered under the pressure of their work. “They would rarely spend time together due to the husband unavailability. “Special occasions such as Christmas, Birthdays and family occasions and anniversaries past them by and their rarely spent any time together as a family as the husband was more devoted to his work than he was to them. “The wife feels that she has been used to portray and enhance the husband’s image as a family man when the reality is that there is no existing relationship between them. “She feels that she has been present for official functions simply for his convenience. On occasions she has been copied into his travel itinerary which has been given to him by his staff on a need to know basis. “The wife has tried to discuss her concerns with the husband. He claims that she is carnal and he is insensitive to her feelings and her needs.” “As a result of the husband’s attitude to their marriage, the wife will say that he is virtually not recognised as a married man in the ministry. His teachings and beliefs on marriage is that the husband is a master and a controller and the wife will say that his concept of biblical; submission is so extreme that it is impossible for her to meet his expectations. She feels humiliated by the way he treats her in the presence of his close female staff members and she feels that she has been taken for granted which has become unbearably stressful for her. “The wife will say that the relationship with the husband is non-existent to the point that his itinerary which was announced publicly at the beginning of the year had no provision for time with his family. “His staff members who travel with him organise both his personal and professional life without any input from her. The wife will say that she is treated with disregard almost like akin to an intruder. “The wife feels that she has been mentally, physically and emotionally deprived of the experience of a marital relationship. She feels that the husband has persistently judged her and his communication with her has been unduly harsh. The wife knows that he was hard to please and has been extremely critical. The wife reserves the right to expand on all of these particulars if the divorce petition is defended.”
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
DIVORCE SAGA: Court
papers show Anita Oyakhilome did not accuse husband of adultery
By Ezekiel Attah on September 7, 2014
Pin It
IMG_3869.JPG
Court papers filed by Pastor Anita Oyakhilome seeking to divorce her
husband, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, the President of Believers’ Love World
Inc., popularly known as Christ Embassy, has shown that adultery was
not part of her reasons.
The papers showed that she is seeks divorce on behaviours that suggest
that she cannot ‘reasonably be expected’ to live with him contrary
media report that Anita decided to divorce Pastor Chris based on
allegations of ‘adultery’ and ‘unreasonable behaviours’
According to report from ThisDay, the court papers for the divorce
process filed at the Principal Registry of the Family Division (PRFD)
of the High Court of Justice revealed that she applied for “divorce on
the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.”
In her statement of case in support of petition at PRFD with number
FD14001650, Pastor Anita however, accused her husband of having
inappropriate relationship with some of his female staff members.
According to the statement, “the wife has discussed with the husband his
appropriate relationship with some of his female staff members. She has
explained that this has given her cause for concern. The husband has
minimised her worries and taken no step to alleviate her grievances.”
In fact, the statement indicated no allegation of adultery as there was
no co-respondent to the petition and no names were mentioned.
Dictionary.com defines adultery as “voluntary sexual intercourse between
a married person and a person who is not their spouse.”
The statement reads in part: “The wife submits that her marriage to the
husband has irretrievably broken down and there is no hope of
reconciliation.
“The wife will submit that it is the husband’s unreasonable behaviours
which have led to this.
“The husband and the wife are both Pastors. The husband undertakes his
work, in the main, in South Africa and Nigeria. The wife lives in the
United Kingdom.
“The wife will say that they have lived separately for 16 years and over
this time have drifted apart.
“The wife has come to realise that the husband will only visit the UK
for annual church programmes that he holds rather than to be with this
wife.
“The wife feels that he has been unavailable as a father to their
children during their developing years.
“The wife feels that their marriage suffered under the pressure of their
work.
“They would rarely spend time together due to the husband
unavailability.
“Special occasions such as Christmas, Birthdays and family occasions and
anniversaries past them by and their rarely spent any time together as a
family as the husband was more devoted to his work than he was to them.
“The wife feels that she has been used to portray and enhance the
husband’s image as a family man when the reality is that there is no
existing relationship between them.
“She feels that she has been present for official functions simply for
his convenience. On occasions she has been copied into his travel
itinerary which has been given to him by his staff on a need to know
basis.
“The wife has tried to discuss her concerns with the husband. He claims
that she is carnal and he is insensitive to her feelings and her needs.”
“As a result of the husband’s attitude to their marriage, the wife will
say that he is virtually not recognised as a married man in the
ministry. His teachings and beliefs on marriage is that the husband is a
master and a controller and the wife will say that his concept of
biblical; submission is so extreme that it is impossible for her to meet
his expectations. She feels humiliated by the way he treats her in the
presence of his close female staff members and she feels that she has
been taken for granted which has become unbearably stressful for her.
“The wife will say that the relationship with the husband is
non-existent to the point that his itinerary which was announced
publicly at the beginning of the year had no provision for time with his
family.
“His staff members who travel with him organise both his personal and
professional life without any input from her. The wife will say that she
is treated with disregard almost like akin to an intruder.
“The wife feels that she has been mentally, physically and emotionally
deprived of the experience of a marital relationship. She feels that the
husband has persistently judged her and his communication with her has
been unduly harsh. The wife knows that he was hard to please and has
been extremely critical. The wife reserves the right to expand on all of
these particulars if the divorce petition is defended.”
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
DIVORCE SAGA: Court
papers show Anita Oyakhilome did not accuse husband of adultery
By Ezekiel Attah on September 7, 2014
Pin It
IMG_3869.JPG
Court papers filed by Pastor Anita Oyakhilome seeking to divorce her
husband, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, the President of Believers’ Love World
Inc., popularly known as Christ Embassy, has shown that adultery was
not part of her reasons.
The papers showed that she is seeks divorce on behaviours that suggest
that she cannot ‘reasonably be expected’ to live with him contrary
media report that Anita decided to divorce Pastor Chris based on
allegations of ‘adultery’ and ‘unreasonable behaviours’
According to report from ThisDay, the court papers for the divorce
process filed at the Principal Registry of the Family Division (PRFD)
of the High Court of Justice revealed that she applied for “divorce on
the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.”
In her statement of case in support of petition at PRFD with number
FD14001650, Pastor Anita however, accused her husband of having
inappropriate relationship with some of his female staff members.
According to the statement, “the wife has discussed with the husband his
appropriate relationship with some of his female staff members. She has
explained that this has given her cause for concern. The husband has
minimised her worries and taken no step to alleviate her grievances.”
In fact, the statement indicated no allegation of adultery as there was
no co-respondent to the petition and no names were mentioned.
Dictionary.com defines adultery as “voluntary sexual intercourse between
a married person and a person who is not their spouse.”
The statement reads in part: “The wife submits that her marriage to the
husband has irretrievably broken down and there is no hope of
reconciliation.
“The wife will submit that it is the husband’s unreasonable behaviours
which have led to this.
“The husband and the wife are both Pastors. The husband undertakes his
work, in the main, in South Africa and Nigeria. The wife lives in the
United Kingdom.
“The wife will say that they have lived separately for 16 years and over
this time have drifted apart.
“The wife has come to realise that the husband will only visit the UK
for annual church programmes that he holds rather than to be with this
wife.
“The wife feels that he has been unavailable as a father to their
children during their developing years.
“The wife feels that their marriage suffered under the pressure of their
work.
“They would rarely spend time together due to the husband
unavailability.
“Special occasions such as Christmas, Birthdays and family occasions and
anniversaries past them by and their rarely spent any time together as a
family as the husband was more devoted to his work than he was to them.
“The wife feels that she has been used to portray and enhance the
husband’s image as a family man when the reality is that there is no
existing relationship between them.
“She feels that she has been present for official functions simply for
his convenience. On occasions she has been copied into his travel
itinerary which has been given to him by his staff on a need to know
basis.
“The wife has tried to discuss her concerns with the husband. He claims
that she is carnal and he is insensitive to her feelings and her needs.”
“As a result of the husband’s attitude to their marriage, the wife will
say that he is virtually not recognised as a married man in the
ministry. His teachings and beliefs on marriage is that the husband is a
master and a controller and the wife will say that his concept of
biblical; submission is so extreme that it is impossible for her to meet
his expectations. She feels humiliated by the way he treats her in the
presence of his close female staff members and she feels that she has
been taken for granted which has become unbearably stressful for her.
“The wife will say that the relationship with the husband is
non-existent to the point that his itinerary which was announced
publicly at the beginning of the year had no provision for time with his
family.
“His staff members who travel with him organise both his personal and
professional life without any input from her. The wife will say that she
is treated with disregard almost like akin to an intruder.
“The wife feels that she has been mentally, physically and emotionally
deprived of the experience of a marital relationship. She feels that the
husband has persistently judged her and his communication with her has
been unduly harsh. The wife knows that he was hard to please and has
been extremely critical. The wife reserves the right to expand on all of
these particulars if the divorce petition is defended.”
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
DIVORCE SAGA: Court
papers show Anita Oyakhilome did not accuse husband of adultery
By Ezekiel Attah on September 7, 2014
Pin It
IMG_3869.JPG
Court papers filed by Pastor Anita Oyakhilome seeking to divorce her
husband, Pastor Chris Oyakhilome, the President of Believers’ Love World
Inc., popularly known as Christ Embassy, has shown that adultery was
not part of her reasons.
The papers showed that she is seeks divorce on behaviours that suggest
that she cannot ‘reasonably be expected’ to live with him contrary
media report that Anita decided to divorce Pastor Chris based on
allegations of ‘adultery’ and ‘unreasonable behaviours’
According to report from ThisDay, the court papers for the divorce
process filed at the Principal Registry of the Family Division (PRFD)
of the High Court of Justice revealed that she applied for “divorce on
the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.”
In her statement of case in support of petition at PRFD with number
FD14001650, Pastor Anita however, accused her husband of having
inappropriate relationship with some of his female staff members.
According to the statement, “the wife has discussed with the husband his
appropriate relationship with some of his female staff members. She has
explained that this has given her cause for concern. The husband has
minimised her worries and taken no step to alleviate her grievances.”
In fact, the statement indicated no allegation of adultery as there was
no co-respondent to the petition and no names were mentioned.
Dictionary.com defines adultery as “voluntary sexual intercourse between
a married person and a person who is not their spouse.”
The statement reads in part: “The wife submits that her marriage to the
husband has irretrievably broken down and there is no hope of
reconciliation.
“The wife will submit that it is the husband’s unreasonable behaviours
which have led to this.
“The husband and the wife are both Pastors. The husband undertakes his
work, in the main, in South Africa and Nigeria. The wife lives in the
United Kingdom.
“The wife will say that they have lived separately for 16 years and over
this time have drifted apart.
“The wife has come to realise that the husband will only visit the UK
for annual church programmes that he holds rather than to be with this
wife.
“The wife feels that he has been unavailable as a father to their
children during their developing years.
“The wife feels that their marriage suffered under the pressure of their
work.
“They would rarely spend time together due to the husband
unavailability.
“Special occasions such as Christmas, Birthdays and family occasions and
anniversaries past them by and their rarely spent any time together as a
family as the husband was more devoted to his work than he was to them.
“The wife feels that she has been used to portray and enhance the
husband’s image as a family man when the reality is that there is no
existing relationship between them.
“She feels that she has been present for official functions simply for
his convenience. On occasions she has been copied into his travel
itinerary which has been given to him by his staff on a need to know
basis.
“The wife has tried to discuss her concerns with the husband. He claims
that she is carnal and he is insensitive to her feelings and her needs.”
“As a result of the husband’s attitude to their marriage, the wife will
say that he is virtually not recognised as a married man in the
ministry. His teachings and beliefs on marriage is that the husband is a
master and a controller and the wife will say that his concept of
biblical; submission is so extreme that it is impossible for her to meet
his expectations. She feels humiliated by the way he treats her in the
presence of his close female staff members and she feels that she has
been taken for granted which has become unbearably stressful for her.
“The wife will say that the relationship with the husband is
non-existent to the point that his itinerary which was announced
publicly at the beginning of the year had no provision for time with his
family.
“His staff members who travel with him organise both his personal and
professional life without any input from her. The wife will say that she
is treated with disregard almost like akin to an intruder.
“The wife feels that she has been mentally, physically and emotionally
deprived of the experience of a marital relationship. She feels that the
husband has persistently judged her and his communication with her has
been unduly harsh. The wife knows that he was hard to please and has
been extremely critical. The wife reserves the right to expand on all of
these particulars if the divorce petition is defended.”Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
Read more at: http://www.today.ng/news/divorce-saga-court-papers-show-anita-oyakhilome-did-not-accuse-husband-of-adultery/
No comments:
Post a Comment